Sunday, March 8, 2015

Josh Willingham: The Most Underrated Baseball Player of the 21st Century

    • Josh Willingham retired after the 2014 season with very little fanfare. He was a backup outfielder and DH on the American League champion Royals, but had only four at at bats in the 2014 postseason. That was the only time he ever made it into the playoffs, and the only award he won in his career was a Silver Slugger in 2012. He was so unremarkable that despite the fact that I have probably watched half of the Phillies games over the past 10 years, I couldn't remember whether or not he ever played in Philadelphia (I was actually thinking of Ty Wigginton in 2012). He was a journeyman who played for 5 teams in his 11 seasons, starting on the Marlins, then moving on to the Nationals, the Twins, the A's, and the Royals. In his 8 career seasons where he played over 100 games he only played on one team with a .500 record (the 2008 Marlins who went 84-78). The teams he played for in those 8 seasons had a combined record of 567-728. On the surface, his career looks pretty average, indistinguishable from other boring guys with a bit of power like Wigginton, Luke Scott, or Kelly Johnson. But when you look at the statistics he put up, Willingham was an extremely efficient and consistent player, and may have been incredibly underrated.

    • One of the best ways to measure a player's public perception is all star game appearances. It is based on voting from fans, players, and managers, and while it may not always show who the best players are, it shows who the public believes to be the best players. Willingham never made an all star game. On it's own that isn't especially strange. Most players never make an all star game. However, very few players as productive as Willingham never make it. In his career, Willingham hit 195 home runs, 216 doubles, and 553 walks. Exactly 200 players have hit over 190 homers, 200 doubles, and 500 walks in their careers since the first all star game in 1933. Of those 200, only 17 have never been all stars, and 5 of those 17 (Travis Hafner, Kevin McReynolds, Deron Johnson, Kirk Gibson, and Eric Karros) finished in the top 5 of MVP voting at some point in their careers.
       Since his first full season in 2006, Willingham has hit 20 or more home runs in 5 different seasons. During that time, 47 players have had at least 5 such seasons. Only 3 of those 47 (Willingham, Mark Reynolds, and Adam LaRoche) have never been all stars. His 194 home runs since 2006 put him 30th  overall in that period, and are comparable to Brian McCann (194), Justin Morneau (193), Josh Hamilton (192), Hanley Ramirez (191), and David Wright (189). Since 2006, he has a .358 OBP, which is 30th among all players who have played at least 1000 games during that time. Of those 30, only him and David DeJesus have never been all stars.
      Since 2006, Justin Morneau has played 1183 games and hit .288/.356/.488 with 193 homers. In that time he has won an MVP award, been to 4 all star games, and won 2 silver sluggers. He hit 34 home runs in 2006, the second most by a Twins player in the 21st century.

      Since 2006, Willingham has played 1147 games and hit .253/.358/.467 with 194 homers. In that time he has won 1 Silver Slugger. He hit 35 home runs in 2012, the most by a Twins player in the 21st century.
    • Willingham excelled at doing positive things that aren't especially noticeable. Consistency is a trait that is usually only observed when it is missing. It was very noticeable in 2011 when Ryan Howard hit .266/.370/.550 with 30 home runs against right handed pitchers and then only hit .224/.286/.347 with 3 homers against lefties. It was extremely noticeable when Chris Davis went from hitting .286 with 53 home runs and 42 doubles in 2013 to hitting .196 with 26 homers and 16 doubles in 2014. It isn't quite so noticeable when Willingham puts up freakishly consistent splits over his entire career:
      • Against RHP vs LHP
        • RHP: .254/.355/.457
        • LHP: .248/.368/.486
      • Home vs. away games
        • Home: 554 games, .250/.360/.462, 93 homers, 98 doubles, 279 walks
        • Away: 593 games, .255/.368/.468, 102 homers, 118 doubles, 274 walks
      • Number of outs in inning (he has 1549, 1527, and 1540 career plate appearances respectively at each):
        • 1: .263/.361/.489, 73 HR, 72 doubles, 5 triples, 171 walks
        • 2: .251/.349/.460, 61 HR, 76 doubles, 5 triples, 174 walks
        • 3: .243/.365/.445, 61 HR, 68 doubles, 5 triples, 208 walks
      • Night vs. day games
        • Night: .251/.357/.452
        • Day: .255/.361/.471
    • The only split I could find with any noticeable variance was positive: he hit .263/.387/.469 with runners in scoring position and .252/.404/.480 with two outs and runners in scoring position, compared to .246/.344/.466 without RISP. Willingham was like a baseball robot: he would go out and hit with above average power and plate discipline no matter what situation he was in. 

    • Just being a remarkably consistent right handed power hitter would make Willingham an exceptional player, but what really set him apart was his excellence in the little stats: hit by pitches and double plays grounded into. His 112 career HBPs are 4th most by any player since 2005, and his 86 career GIDPs are tied for the 41st fewest by any player who has played at least 1000 games since 2005. Power hitters with that many HBPs and that few GIDPs are incredibly rare. There have been only 3 players in the history of baseball who have hit over 190 career home runs, been hit by over 100 pitches, and grounded into fewer than 100 double plays: Brady Anderson, Chase Utley, and Josh Willingham. 

    • Willingham wasn't a hall of fame player, or among the greats of his generation. He never developed a significant fan base since he never played more than three seasons for any team, and was never a major contributor on a playoff team. Most of the teams that he played for were terrible. But he was, for almost a decade, a quietly effective, all star level player, and he should be remembered as such.

Friday, March 6, 2015

The Case For a Breakout 2015 from Domonic Brown

   
       A few times each generation, a player is able to make the big leagues in their late teens or early twenties and immediately succeed. Think Mike Trout, Ken Griffey Jr, Alex Rodriguez, Mel Ott, Ty Cobb, and Mickey Mantle. This particular generation has seen quite a few of these types of players, with Trout being joined by Bryce Harper, Manny Machado, Jason Heyward, and Giancarlo Stanton. These players seem to have made some believe that immediate major league stardom by top prospects is the norm rather than the exception. In reality, only a certain type of player succeeds at that age. They are all way above average in both speed and power, have gold glove defensive tools, and are able to adjust to major league pitching very quickly. When Dom Brown was first called up, he was expected to join this group. In 2011, MLB.com listed Brown as the 4th best prospect in baseball, behind only Trout, Harper, and Jeremy Hellickson. He was ranked ahead of future stars such as Aroldis Chapman (6), Freddie Freeman (17), Machado (24), Chris Sale (25), and Devin Mesoraco (45) as well as many other solid major leaguers. For a brief period in 2013, Brown appeared to be living up to his immense hype, hitting .291/.325/.612 with 18 homers, 10 doubles, and 3 triples over May and June and making the All Star Game. He then followed that up with only 6 home runs, 8 doubles, and 1 triple over the final 3 months of 2013, and hit only .235/.285/.349 with 10 homers and 22 doubles in 2014. Brown is not, as was once expected of him, a well rounded superstar who would come into immediate MLB success. What is more likely is that his career path will follow that of a different type of star: the power hitter who figures it out and becomes a star in his late 20s. 
Mickey Mantle had already hit 249 career home runs before he turned 27; shockingly, this is not common.

      The most extreme example of this archetype is Jose Bautista. Bautista played his first full season at age 25. In his first four seasons, from ages 25-28, he was a pretty mediocre player. He hit .242 with 15 homers and 22 doubles per season over that period, with highs of 16 homers and 36 doubles. Then in 2010, at age 29, he suddenly hit 54 homers and 35 doubles, and he has hit more home runs than anyone else this decade (by which I mean way more; he has hit 187, Miguel Cabrera is second with 181, third is a tie between Albert Pujols and Giancarlo Stanton at 154).
Jose Bautista came out of nowhere to become the most prolific home run hitter of the 2010s

      A more likely career path for Brown is that of Carlos Pena. In 2001, Baseball America rated Pena as the 11th best prospect in baseball. He played his first full season at 24, and for his first three seasons he averaged .241 with 21 HR, 20 doubles, and 5 triples per season. Like Brown he showed flashes of his potential. Pena's age 26 season and Brown's age 25 were almost identical; here is a comparison:
    • Pena, 2004: .241/.338/.472, 27 HR, 22 2B, 4 triples, 7 steals, 2.8 WAR
    • Brown, 2013: .272/.324/.494, 27 HR, 21 2B, 4 triples, 8 steals, 2.1 WAR
Both of them followed that up with a pretty weak season. Pena then hit 46 home runs in 2007 and averaged .236/.366/.505 with 34 HR, 25 doubles, and 4.0 WAR per season from 2007 through 2011. So the career path for both started as top prospects then went into several mediocre seasons with flashes of potential. Pena then became a star; Brown might do so as well.
Carlos Pena was a former top prospect who failed to live up to expectations until his late 20s

        Pena and Bautista are far from the only examples of this. Unlike the 5-tool types listed earlier, players whose main skill is power tend to break out in their late 20s or early 30s. Here are a few more examples:

Player Age of first full season Average season pre breakout Career high home runs pre breakout Age of breakout and breakout year stats Career high home runs post breakout
Tino Martinez 24 18 HR, 22 2B, 1.2 WAR 20 27;
31 HR, 35 2B, 4.5 WAR
44
Edwin Encarnacion 23 18 HR, 25 2B, .9 WAR 26 29; .
42 HR, 24 2B, 5.0 WAR
42
Chris Davis 22 11 HR, 15 2B, -.4 WAR 21 26;
33 HR, 20 2B, 1.6 WAR
53
David Ortiz 24 16 HR, 28 2B, 2.5 WAR 20 27;
31 HR, 39 2B, 3.3 WAR
54
Jermaine Dye 22 13 HR, 20 2B, .9 WAR 27 26; .
33 HR, 41 2B, 4.6 WAR
44
Domonic Brown 25 18 HR, 22 2B, .7 WAR 27 ? ?

      Although Brown first came up in 2010, he has only actually played two full seasons, and he was an All-Star in one of them. A bad season by a good player in their mid-20s isn't always a good predictor of future performance. His age 25 and 26 seasons were almost identical to Paul Konerko's age 26 and 27 seasons. Here is a comparison:
    • Konerko 2002: Hit 27 home runs and was elected to the All Star game on the back of a monster June where he hit .340 with 12 homers; never hit more than 4 home runs in any other month. Finished with 2.1 WAR.
    • Brown 2013: Hit 27 home runs and was elected to the All Star game on the back of a monster May where he hit .303 with 12 homers; never hit more than 6 home runs in any other month. Finished with 2.1 WAR.
    • Konerko 2003: Hit .234 with 18 homers, 19 doubles, and -.6 WAR.
    • Brown 2014: Hit .235 with 10 homers, 22 doubles, and -1.4 WAR.
          Konerko in 2003 was better than Brown in 2014, but not by much. Konerko followed that season up with two consecutive 40 home run seasons, and would go on to hit 310 more homers in his career from age 28 to his retirement at 38. 
White Sox legend Paul Konerko, like Brown, followed up an all star season in his mid 20s with a below-replacement level season. He then played for 11 more years and made 5 more All Star games

     I may just be an optimist. Brown may never reach his full potential; there have certainly been plenty of talented top prospects who for whatever reason never quite make it. There are also a lot of power hitters who struggle through their early to mid 20s and then figure things out and become stars in their late 20s. Brown might never become a 40 home run guy, and even if he does it might not be next year and he might not do it on the Phillies. However, if he does have a big 2015 it would be far from unique. Players almost never reach their power potential in their early 20s. Here are some numbers on home runs and age in recent years:
    • Number of players who have hit 35 or more home runs in a season since 2005:
      • 57
    • Number of players who have hit 35 or more home runs in a season since 2005 who were 25 or younger:
      • 13
    • Number of players who have hit 35 or more home runs in a season since 2005 who were 24 or younger:
      • 4 (Stanton, Trout, Prince Fielder, and Ryan Braun)

Players like Stanton and Trout are rightfully praised for being so great at such a young age, but most players just aren't physically mature enough to consistently hit home runs in the major leagues in their early 20s. Brown has already shown that he has the power to hit a lot of home runs; in May 2013 he was able to hit 12 in a single month. Brown's main weakness on offense is his plate discipline, a trait that tends to improve with age and experience. A lot of writers and analysts have written Brown off as a terrible player on a hopeless Phillies team after his bad 2014. This seems to me like an incredibly short sighted view. Really, what would be stranger: Brown bouncing back after a bad season and putting up the best season of his career as he enters his late 20s, or a former All Star and top prospect being a complete bust with no hope for the future at 27? Power hitters do not peak when they are 25; aging in baseball almost never works that way. Brown may have already had his best season, but I think that it is much more likely that he will greatly improve over the next few years. 

All stats in this post are from Baseball Reference